|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages : - |
|||
| Lower absorption |  |
||
| High Productivity and Larger Diameter - 3 inch wafer currently available | |||
| Higher thermal conductivity among Congruent Lithium Niobate and Tantalate products | |||
| Higher Optical Damage Threshold than Magnesium Doped Lithium Niobate (compared to MgO 5mol%) | |||
LT |
LN |
MgLT |
MgLN |
|
| Specific heat / Jkg -1K -1[25°] | 402 |
640 |
396 |
634 |
| Thermal conductivity / W/mK [25°] * | 4.1 |
3.5 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
| Optical damage threshold at 514.5nm / W/cm 2 | 840 |
20 |
<1.4M |
<1.4M |
| Refractive index [ne] at 632.8nm | 2.183 |
2.203 |
2.177 |
2.193 |
| Refractive index [no] at 632.8nm | 2.178 |
2.288 |
2.173 |
2.283 |
* Laser Flash method
Thermal conductivity increases as the doping concentration of MgO increases, but crystal growth becomes difficult above 9 mol%.
Doping concentrations of 8 mol% and 9 mol% have almost equal thermal conductivity of the x-axis, so 8 mol% results n the optimal solution.
 |
 |
Reproduced by kind permission ofYamaju Ceramics Co., Ltd. . © Yamaju 2004 Specifications subject to change without notice. All rights reserved Roditi International 2007